![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
public, voice;
This is Chief Kate Beckett, making a quick note as a courtesy. You may not recognize me when I come into the office this morning. I'm, uh. Male. Castle, I took the liberty of raiding your wardrobe.
Go ahead, get the laughter out now. [And Kate flips to video, linefacing and looking fairly unamused. And manly!]
police filter, voice;
It's been over a week. What does everyone have so far, because this needs to be cleaned up yesterday.
[ooc: Kate Beckett is manly! Responses from
nicholasheat. As far as the police business, I figure we're moving along through the investigation stage, so along with what anyone comments here, we'd likely be to the point where they submit that they've no evidence supporting the accusations and might even possibly have alibis and other evidence refuting the accusations? Sorry I've been a little behind and chaotic with the open threads on this plot, I'm not really absolutely sure where we're supposed to be at this point, so correct me if I'm mistaken! :) Alsoooo bendytime to the morning if that's okay?]
This is Chief Kate Beckett, making a quick note as a courtesy. You may not recognize me when I come into the office this morning. I'm, uh. Male. Castle, I took the liberty of raiding your wardrobe.
Go ahead, get the laughter out now. [And Kate flips to video, linefacing and looking fairly unamused. And manly!]
police filter, voice;
It's been over a week. What does everyone have so far, because this needs to be cleaned up yesterday.
[ooc: Kate Beckett is manly! Responses from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-27 04:33 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2010-06-27 04:45 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2010-06-27 04:49 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2010-06-27 04:51 am (UTC)If you'd like, I can arrange for somewhere for you to stay. A witness protection kind of thing?
private;
Date: 2010-06-27 04:53 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2010-06-27 05:12 am (UTC)These are the options I have for you, with the resources I can pool. I'm sorry if it's not enough but we're doing the best we can.
[Stressed from manliness and overworking, she gets-- hissy. Eep.]
private;
Date: 2010-06-27 05:16 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2010-06-27 05:36 am (UTC)private; I can't be angry at that face...
Date: 2010-06-27 05:42 am (UTC)private; it is quite pitiful, isn't it?
Date: 2010-06-27 05:55 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2010-06-27 05:57 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2010-06-27 07:02 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2010-06-27 07:10 am (UTC)voice | police filter
Date: 2010-06-27 12:38 pm (UTC)Forensics has concluded our investigation of the original crime scenes; I e-mailed you a more detailed final report a moment ago. As I suspected, we were unable to discover any new evidence pertaining to the crimes. I also took the initiative to go over the physical evidence gathered during the initial investigations of the assaults. The conclusions drawn from them remained unchanged after my review - a separate report of this is included in the e-mail.
[Next is added tersely, because Brennan hates admitting she was unable to find anything new despite the numerous overtime hours she spent on every little detail.]
Forensically, there's nothing to definitively tie the suspects to these crimes.
voice | police filter
Date: 2010-06-30 01:11 am (UTC)Great, so I've got two victims breathing down my neck and possible killers still on the loose. And it doesn't seem we'll ever have definitive evidence of anything. Ever.
voice | police filter
Date: 2010-06-30 08:29 am (UTC)Oh? I would have expected someone with your experience to realize returning to crime scenes weeks after the actual crime took place to gather new evidence is statistically all but useless. The existing evidence simply did not match the suspects, and that's an irrefutable fact. But you are welcome to get a second opinion from somebody more accomplished in the field of forensic science than I am, provided you can find one here.
[Police Filter; Voice]
Date: 2010-06-28 05:41 pm (UTC)Plus, I dunno if it counts for anythin' but Ray's not the sort t'shoot a bloke. If 'e 'ad a problem with Ken, he'd've sorted it out in a proper fight. Don't s'pose any of that counts as proper evidence, though.
[Police Filter; Voice]
Date: 2010-06-30 01:14 am (UTC)Maybe by then you'll be able to figure out what to call me.
[So, frustrated. And not handling the being male thing as well as she'd like everyone to believe.]
[Police Filter; Voice; 1/2]
Date: 2010-06-30 01:22 am (UTC)[Police Filter; Voice; 2/3, sorry, lied]
Date: 2010-06-30 01:24 am (UTC)[Police Filter; Voice]
Date: 2010-06-30 01:33 am (UTC)Jus' thought maybe if Ray 'ad no motive[But he doesn't actually say that because he doesn't really want to challenge Kate's decision on his "evidence".]
I'll try an' come in tomorrow, to 'elp properly, look over th' case files. I'm just sort of stuck in me flat for the time bein'.
[Police Filter; Voice]
Date: 2010-06-30 02:36 am (UTC)But on top of that, why is this hard, Chris? Because we get two accusations out of nowhere, just magically remembered. Who's to say the deities aren't messing with us? We need hard evidence. Something that definitely says yes or no.
I need you to step up your game. You're Intel right now Chris. It's all you.
[Police Filter; Voice]
Date: 2010-06-30 03:30 am (UTC)Shouldn't be that hard, I know. Only it 'appened so long ago...s'hard to come by alibis. Must be somethin' in th'case files I missed. Wish I remembered whenever it was that Ken was murdered. If I knew Ray'd been drinkin' with me an' Dean...
Anyway, steppin' up me game, guv. I'll come over soon as it's dark.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 02:22 am (UTC)[ooc; so late, sorry flkewnflkewf! still wanna do some action spam?]
no subject
Date: 2010-06-30 01:16 am (UTC)[ooc: No problem -- I didn't even actually get around to posting Hardison even, but yeah if you'd like them to run into each other somehow I'm all game.]
no subject
Date: 2010-06-30 03:56 am (UTC)[ooc; \o/ Any ideas, comment spam wise?]
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-30 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-01 12:24 am (UTC)